Climate activist Juliet Lamont was handed a suspended prison sentence in Bowen Magistrates Court on December 2 for peacefully protesting Adani鈥檚 central Queensland coal mine.
The 50-year-old documentary filmmaker and mother of two was given a one month jail term, suspended for nine months, after being charged for locking on to a train carrying the first coal from Adani鈥檚 mine on November 30.
Refused bail, Lamont was kept in custody for two nights before her hearing.
Her sentence comes just over a week after another climate activist, Sergio Herbert, was given a 12 month jail term for sitting on a coal train in Newcastle. Herbert was subsequently released on bail, pending an appeal against the sentence.
Lamont said of her protest: 鈥淚 feel a profound moral obligation to protect our futures. The science is in and the writing is on the wall.
鈥淚t really is time for ordinary Australians to act. I know I couldn鈥檛 live with myself and couldn鈥檛 look my daughters in the eye if I did nothing. So I鈥檓 taking direct action.鈥
Frontline Action on Coal spokesperson Andy Paine said: 鈥淭his is the latest example of consistent overreach by the legal system against climate activists who are taking non-violent action against industries that are knowingly destroying our climate.
鈥淚t鈥檚 not just the prison sentences that we have seen handed out recently. There is a repeated trend of those who make and enforce the law abusing it to restrict protest movement.鈥澛
A new report by Greenpeace, , identifies an alarming escalation in repression against climate activists.
Forms of repression included: harsh, and at times unconstitutional, anti-protest laws; punitive bail laws and excessive penalties;聽threats to deregister charities that engage in climate activism;聽the targeting of activists with litigation;聽and surveilling and infiltrating groups of climate defenders.
Paine said: 鈥淚f the police, courts and governments of Australia put as much effort into punishing those who are destroying our climate as they do to those trying to save it, maybe we wouldn鈥檛 be in the ecological crisis that we are.
鈥淏ut the blatant hypocrisy of our legal system means that people of conscience and courage are going to keep taking direct action like this. It is the only avenue ordinary Australians have to address the disproportionate political power of polluting industries.鈥