When you are the Only Democracy in the Middle EastTM you don鈥檛 need to worry about petty little things such as human rights. And so ABC Online reported on March 27 that .
The final outrage that forced Israel to cut ties was a UNHRC vote in favour of investigating whether illegal Israeli settlements in the Palestinian West Bank were, in fact, infringing the rights of Palestinians.
Israel said this showed just how biased the body was. And fair enough, as everyone knows the idea that Palestinians have rights is just an anti-Semitic plot to destroy the state of Israel and drive all Jews into the sea.
But it may seem to the uninformed observer that perhaps there is something here for the UNHRC to look into. After all, it does seem a bit rough to keep building Jewish-only settlements on Palestinian territory, demolish people鈥檚 homes, take their land, seize their water supplies, build a giant network of checkpoints and Israeli-citizen only roads to carve up the territory, and then jail and shoot those who protest.
Some might even suggest Israel鈥檚 policy of their homes to make way for Jewish people is possibly an act of total and utter bastardry.
But the ABC explained: 鈥淚srael cites historical and Biblical links to the West Bank.鈥
Well, that is perfectly clear then. Sure, Palestinians have lived on their land for centuries, but sometime back there were probably Jewish people on those spots 鈥 and anyway, God said the land belongs to Israel.
You really have to wonder just who the hell the UNHRC think they are 鈥 questioning God鈥檚 word. But if you think that鈥檚 bad, what on Earth are we to make of the impertinence of the Palestinians? They have the gall to live there for centuries, in flagrant violation of God鈥檚 will. It is fucking blasphemy.
And yet it seems there are just some people who can鈥檛 see the inherent justice of Israel鈥檚 case.
But it is not just in the occupied Palestinian territories that there are people who refuse to accept God鈥檚 verdict. Even within Israel itself, there are those who just refuse to come to terms, even more than 60 years since Israel鈥檚 founding, with the fact the land is just not for them.
Such is the case of the Bedouin people who have lived in the Negev region of southern Israel for thousands of years. The Israeli state, no doubt pointing to a lack of Biblical links, refuses to 鈥渞ecognise鈥 many Bedouin villages 鈥 and therefore plans to get rid of them.
Electronic Intifada said on March 28 that . This involves the demolition of many 鈥渦nrecognised Bedouin villages鈥 so they can be replaced with God鈥檚 chosen people.
told US officials in 2005 that plans to 鈥渄evelop鈥 the Negev would involve the forced 鈥渞elocation of some 65,000 Bedouin living in unrecognized villages鈥. Electronic Intifada said this was roughly the total number of Bedouins living in all 鈥渦nrecognised villages鈥.
A March 21 , which used the phrase 鈥渁partheid鈥 to describe Israel鈥檚 policies.
Really, anti-Israel bias is just rife right through the UN, which constantly says 鈥渢hat鈥檚 racist鈥 just because Israel aims to dispossess a race of people on the basis of their race!
Luckily, the Murdoch media are there to stand up for poor, victimised Israel, with only nuclear weapons and US$3 billion of US military aid each year with which to defend itself.
Because, sad as it is to say, doing God鈥檚 work sometimes breeds resistance.
And so it came to be that it was up to The Australian to respond to the unarmed demonstrations by Palestinians on Israel鈥檚 borders in June last year to protest Israeli land grabs.
The . This prompted a June 7 opinion piece, entitled 鈥淧alestinians deadly strategy doomed to fail鈥, : 鈥淚t is time for Palestinians to resume a non-violent struggle of negotiations and give up their strategy of confronting Israeli bullets.鈥
Of all the evil, anti-Semitic terrorist plots the Palestinians have come up with, their deadly strategy of confronting Israeli bullets with their bodies, and getting themselves killed, has got to be the most dastardly yet.
In the face of such provocation, what could the God-fearing Israeli military possibly do but shoot them?
[Read .Follow Carlo Sands on Twitter .]
Comments
Anonymous replied on Permalink
Anonymous replied on Permalink
carlo sands replied on Permalink
carlo sands replied on Permalink
Anonymous replied on Permalink
Anonymous replied on Permalink
Anonymous replied on Permalink
Anonymous replied on Permalink
carlo sands replied on Permalink
carlo sands replied on Permalink
Anonymous replied on Permalink
Anonymous replied on Permalink