Climate activists celebrated the Lismore Local Court decision on September 27 to drop all charges against Mali Cooper relating to Blockade Australia聽protests in June.
They were charged with blocking traffic in the Sydney Harbour Tunnel as part of a week of disruptive action to draw attention to the escalating climate disaster.
Police were heavy handed, even before the week of action. Extremely punitive bail conditions were imposed on those arrested for little more than attending the protests.
鈥淚 have watched the town [of Lismore] I love be decimated by a climate disaster,鈥澛燙ooper . Lismore聽flooded twice聽in the lead-up to the June protests.聽
鈥淚f we stand together and resist through direct action, we have the best chance of turning this destruction around,鈥 Cooper said.
The charges were dismissed because the court 鈥済ave full consideration鈥 to Cooper鈥檚 mental health, which included a clinical diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder after the Lismore floods,聽lawyer Mark Davis said.
This means the decision will not necessarily become a precedent for other arrestees who will also face the courts.
As with Cooper, the coming cases will test the New South Wales government鈥檚 draconian anti-protest laws.
Activists potentially face two years in prison and $22,000 fines. Before the new laws were enacted, Cooper鈥檚 alleged offence would have faced a聽.
Davis described the 鈥渆xtraordinarily repressive piece of legislation鈥 as 鈥渦nbecoming of Australia and the conventions that we normally follow.
鈥淚t鈥檚 off the charts. It was great to see it avoided today.鈥
Meanwhile, Extinction Rebellion activist Carmen Stobaus was聽聽on September 27 in Western Australia. Stobaus was charged with writing chalk messages on a footbridge near the Woodside office in Perth in August last year.
Prosecutors failed to prove who owned the footbridge, meaning there was not enough evidence for a conviction.
Socialist Alliance national co-convenor Sam Wainwright welcomed the acquittals but told聽91自拍论坛聽the pushback against anti-protest laws needs to continue聽until they are repealed.
鈥淕overnments are so committed to protecting the interests of fossil fuel corporations,聽they are willing to launch anti-democratic assaults on the climate movement,鈥 he said.
鈥淥ur answer has to be mass resistance and protest, such as the climate actions planned around the November COP27 climate summit.鈥