Looking out: The operator

May 2, 2001
Issue 

“[M]illions of Americans will find their lives changed because [of] Bush's views on ... ergonomics.” — David Broder, the Atlanta Constitution, March 16, 2001

A subtle contempt is expressed by David Broder in his recent political commentary on the actions of the new man in the White House. I find that a bit ironic since, more often than not, he praised George W. Bush while he was running for office. As one of America's most respected political columnists, his words, when printed in the Washington Post, can make or break politicians.

Broder reports that “four days before [Bill Clinton left office] he allowed sweeping Labor Department regulations to go into effect, requiring employers to deal more promptly and fully with workplace conditions that contribute to strained backs, stiff wrists, cramped hands and all the other symptoms of repetitive motion distress.”

Now, however, corporations the world over will soon be flying high and happy with Bush in the White House. You see, his henchmen and henchwomen in the House of Representatives and the Senate have managed to slide a resolution through that effectively ends the relatively new life of Clinton's ergonomics regulations.

“The ergonomics battle drew a broad coalition of business groups, led by the US Chamber of Commerce and the National Association of Manufacturers. They argue that the regulations would be costly to satisfy and might expose them to a new wave of lawsuits... The losers are . . . organized labor, consumer organizations, advocates of women's and children's causes.”

No surprise there. What I find so egregious about this latest Bush-attack on working citizens is the stealth that went into its almost instant deployment. Alas, most working Americans will not know that they have been given yet another workplace-shaft. Indeed, many will not even know what ergonomics are all about. Perhaps when enough workers find out that they cannot get compensation for workplace injuries, they will not vote for Bush in the next election. He certainly did not vote for them when he signed his name on to his corporate-cronies' dotted/bottom line.

When those workers find themselves in the voting booth again it is my hope that they will remember the definition of ergonomics: “Engineering science concerned with the physical and psychological relationship between machines and people who use them. The ergonomicist takes an empirical approach to the study of human-machine interactions with, the object of improving efficiency of operation and reducing strain and discomfort on the operator” (Columbia Encyclopedia).

BY BRANDON ASTOR JONES

[The writer is a prisoner on death row in the United States. He welcomes letters commenting on his columns (include your name and full return address on the envelope, or prison authorities may refuse to deliver it). He can be written to at: Brandon Astor Jones, EF-122216, G3-77, Georgia Diagnostic & Classification Prison, PO Box 3877, Jackson, GA 30233, USA, or email <brandonastorjones@hotmail.com>. Jones is seeking a publisher for his collected prison writings. Please notify him of any possible leads. Visit Jones' web page at .]

You need 91×ÔÅÄÂÛ̳, and we need you!

91×ÔÅÄÂÛ̳ is funded by contributions from readers and supporters. Help us reach our funding target.

Make a One-off Donation or choose from one of our Monthly Donation options.

Become a supporter to get the digital edition for $5 per month or the print edition for $10 per month. One-time payment options are available.

You can also call 1800 634 206 to make a donation or to become a supporter. Thank you.