News Ltd wages incredible smear war on Lee Rhiannon

February 7, 2012
Issue 
Lee Rhiannon.

News Limited’s flagship newspaper, The Australian, said in a September 2010 that it wanted the Greens to be “destroyed”. The paper’s latest attacks on Greens Senator Lee Rhiannon, which include allegations she held secret meetings with a high-level KGB spy 40 years ago, confirm that its editorial bias hasn’t budged an inch.

Former Liberal Party staffer Christian Kerr wrote in the January 28 Australian that claimed declassified ASIO files put the 18-year-old Rhiannon in a “secret meeting” with a KGB spy in early 1970, before she boarded a Russian ship bound for England. Kerr said the meeting was “seen as a milestone in her ideological development”.

Rhiannon later that day on her blog, saying the ASIO files from which Kerr drew his story are full of inaccuracies.

She said: “[Kerr’s] article is about my trip to England when I was 18 years old. Like many young people just out of school I was travelling with friends before I went on to university.

“Kerr’s attempt to associate my departure on a Russian cruise ship to potential spy activities is ridiculous. I left on the MS Shota Rustaveli as at that time it was the cheapest way to get to England, and unfortunately quite boring as we were at sea for six weeks.

“I have never been a spy and no one ever attempted to recruit me …

“This latest Australian report reveals more about the bias of the News Limited style of journalism and their reliance on spies’ inaccurate reports to back up their stories than it does about my life in the 1970s.”

Rhiannon’s ASIO files contain many mistakes, including several basic factual errors about her overseas travel.

ASIO files are notoriously inaccurate. In a to the federal 2011 , Civil Liberties Australia said its “assessment is that about 25% of [ASIO’s] collected data was in error (ignoring that the errors gave the entirely wrong slant to an understanding of the person under watch, in most instances)”.

The daughter of prominent socialist activists, Rhiannon in an ASIO file when she was just seven years old.

Rhiannon also noted that her copy of the 1970 ASIO file, which was released in 2009, has 91̳ blacked out. But Kerr’s report includes “details about the section that was censored in my ASIO report”.

“An important question that emerges from Kerr’s stories is why and how this Australian reporter receives censored ASIO material about a Greens MP. And is ASIO still wasting resources and breaching ethical codes by spying on committed peace activists such as myself?”

Despite this, Kerr repeated his allegations in the February 4 Australian. Rhiannon , noting Kerr’s article had made several mistakes in relation to the Greens’ past electoral results.

She also asked: “And why is Kerr obsessed with what I was doing in 1970? For a man who accuses others of running conspiracy theories he is pretty good at that himself. He is up to his third story about an ASIO report of a possible meeting that I may have attended. I would like to assist in the forensic intelligence work Australian editor Chris Mitchell appears quite happy for Kerr to obsess with.

“On 19 January 1970 when I left Australia on the MS Shota Rustaveli and for the following six weeks of the voyage and indeed for my whole life to the best of my knowledge, I have never met a Russian spy. I spent that long voyage reading Lord of the Rings and socialising. I never attended a meeting on the ship.”


Comments

Ironical to see a bunch of former Trots rush to the defense of a former SPA Stalinist. I’m old enough to remember the good old days when you lot were bagging each other out ferociously. And “former” for Lee? Well, that is the issue really, because she has never addressed it, side-stepping, unconvincingly raising red herrings and accusing anyone who raises the issue as being guilty of “smear.” Dumb, dumb politics, and it won’t wash. I can’t imagine why she thinks it will. I hold no truck for News Ltd, but you misquote them. The full phrase from the Oz was “destroy at the ballot box”, a big difference to the single word you use. They don’t like Lee or the Greens, that is clear, but is their bias able to sway elections, govern the hearts and minds of the “people”, and dictate the future of the nation? If you do believe that, and I fear you do, then you clearly hold us, the people, in very low regard. In my opinion, close to contempt. Footnote: It seems from your site’s preview pane that I am going to be anonymous if, (doubtful, I would say) I’m posted. For what its worth, normally I use the moniker “Green Thumb.
Dear Green Thumb (aka "us, the people") Your fear is misplaced. I do not hold "us" in contempt. Though the News Corporation media empire certainly does, which is why it continues to peddle blatant misinformation as news. The quote from the Australian is correct. The word used was "destroyed" not "destroy". Please refer to the link provided in the article. Your clarification that the Australian said it wants to destroy the Greens at the ballot box is hardly important. What other possible way could that newspaper seek the destruction of a political party, other than costing it popular support? Simon Butler
The Australian has continued its McCarthyite witch hunt against Senator Rhiannon in its . Christian Kerr wrote: "And she has yet again refused to offer a categorical denial to a report in The Australian that a secret meeting was set up between her and the man identified as the KGB station chief in Australia." I would have thought this was a : “On 19 January 1970 when I left Australia on the MS Shota Rustaveli and for the following six weeks of the voyage and indeed for my whole life to the best of my knowledge, I have never met a Russian spy. I spent that long voyage reading Lord of the Rings and socialising. I never attended a meeting on the ship.” Isn't this another clear example of News Ltd implementing ?: "If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it."

You need 91̳, and we need you!

91̳ is funded by contributions from readers and supporters. Help us reach our funding target.

Make a One-off Donation or choose from one of our Monthly Donation options.

Become a supporter to get the digital edition for $5 per month or the print edition for $10 per month. One-time payment options are available.

You can also call 1800 634 206 to make a donation or to become a supporter. Thank you.