
础听聽confirmed that University of Sydney staff have a legal right to be protected from disciplinary action when exercising intellectual freedom.
The decision resulted from an聽聽brought by the National Tertiary Education Union (NTEU) and Dr Tim Anderson, a former Political Economy academic, against the University of Sydney.
Anderson was聽聽after circulating an image of a swastika superimposed on the Israeli flag. The context was that the image was part of a lecture slide telling students to 鈥渓ook for independent evidence and/or admissions鈥 on civilian deaths in Israel and Palestine.
The decision found that the trial judge, Justice Thomas Thawley, erred in not recognising that clause 315鈥317 of the university鈥檚 , subtitled 鈥淚ntellectual Freedom鈥, created a legally enforceable right for staff to exercise intellectual freedom and to be protected from disciplinary action when doing so.
Justices Jayne Jagot and Darryl Rangiah found that the specific rights and duties in clause 315鈥317 鈥減revail over any other rights and duties鈥 in the enterprise agreement, including where the staff鈥檚 code of conduct is inconsistent with intellectual freedom.
They also said that 鈥渙ffence and insensitivity鈥 are not relevant criteria for deciding whether an action breached those clauses on intellectual freedom.
According to the judgment, Anderson received a letter, pre-termination, which alleged 鈥渟erious misconduct鈥 against the enterprise agreement and the code of conduct, which the University said could justify his termination.
Chief Justice James Allsop reiterated that the subject of intellectual freedom 鈥済oes to the heart of the nature and character of the institution of the university itself鈥.
NTEU general secretary Matthew McGowan said that the NTEU was 鈥渧ery pleased鈥 with the decision which, in its eyes, upheld the 鈥減rimacy and importance of our collective agreements in protecting intellectual and academic freedom鈥.
鈥淯niversities must stop being obsessed with protecting their reputations and their 鈥榖rands鈥 and start ensuring their staff are provided with the freedom to do their important work,鈥 McGowan said.
A University of Sydney spokesperson said: 鈥淲hile we鈥檙e disappointed by today鈥檚 decision to allow this appeal, we will now take time to review the decision and consider it carefully as we plan our next steps鈥.
At the time of聽, the then NTEU President Kurt Iveson said that it had 鈥減rofound implications for the exercise of intellectual freedom for all university staff鈥.
The matter will now be remitted to a lower court to determine whether the university actually did dismiss Anderson, 鈥渋n whole or part,鈥 based on a lawful expression of intellectual freedom.聽
The lower court will also decide whether certain posts Anderson made on his personal social media accounts were a valid exercise of his intellectual freedom. One such post included Anderson鈥檚 former colleague Jay Tharappel, wearing a Houthi Resistance badge which read: 鈥淕od is the greatest, death to America, death to Israel, curse on the Jews, victory to Islam.鈥
[ from Honi Soit.]