The PM鈥檚 $4.3m cliff top home and the housing crisis

October 23, 2024
Issue 
The average price of dwellings in terms of years of per capita household disposable income. Graph: The Australia Institute

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese鈥檚 purchase of a聽聽house in Copacabana, on the New South Wales Central Coast, has rightly spurred debate about Labor鈥檚 policy amid the聽.

Sure, this will only be his third property: other MPs have declared聽聽as many.

罢丑别听Australian Financial Review聽has come to the PM鈥檚 defence, deriding any criticism as an expression of the聽. 鈥淭he derision of people in politics making a buck and accumulating wealth risks deterring successful people from entering the political arena,鈥 warned John Kehoe, the聽AFR鈥檚 economics editor.

Kehoe chided Labor under聽former聽PM Bill Shorten for rhetorically attacking the 鈥渢op end of town鈥, noting 鈥淎lbanese didn鈥檛 like that language and dropped it when he became leader鈥.

He reproached Albanese for trimming back the Stage 3 income cuts for those on the highest tax brackets, before warning Labor not to touch the negative gearing and the capital gains perks for the rich, let alone consider the Greens鈥 鈥渁bsurd housing policies鈥 鈥 rental price freezes, a government-owned company to build public housing and forcing the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) to cut interest rates.

Curtailing negative gearing and the capital gains tax discount (CGT) 鈥渨on鈥檛 fix the housing affordability problem and could have the unintended consequences of deterring investors from building new homes鈥, he argued.

鈥淎lbanese seems to understand this, saying last month he is yet to be convinced that touching the tax arrangements would help the supply of homes,鈥 he added.

Deloitte report and housing affordability

This praise for Albanese from the mouthpiece for the top end of town was prompted by the PM citing a 2019 Deloitte report, commissioned by the Property Council of Australia, to hose down speculation his government was considering changing the negative gearing and CGT discount rules.

However, Greg Jericho, chief economist for The Australia Institute (TAI), has since聽聽that the聽Deloitte report聽concluded the opposite.

It found that had the CGT discount been reduced from 50% to 25% and negative gearing restricted to new homes, as Labor proposed in 2016, housing affordability would have improved and home ownership would have risen 2.5% over a decade.

This would have been 鈥渢he biggest 10-year improvement since the 1970s鈥, Jericho said. 鈥淔rom 2009 to 2019 the rate of home ownership fell 2.5% points from 68.8% to 66.3%. In effect this policy would have reversed that fall, but also led to the first significant increase in home ownership in 40 years.鈥

This would have translated into an additional 300,000 home-owning households by 2030. The same Deloitte study found that these measures would聽also聽not increase rents.

TAI estimates that negative gearing and the CGT discount cost around聽.

Why is Albanese, who loves to remind us that he was raised in public housing, lying about the Deloitte report? To justify Labor鈥檚 landlord tax concessions.

Despite some of its rhetoric, Labor is determined to prove itself a trustworthy servant of the rich and powerful.

Labor backs the fossil fuel corporations鈥 climate wrecking expansion plans, helps bosses smash militant construction industry trade unions, and supports the US-led arms race and complicity in Israel鈥檚 genocidal war in the Middle East.

Its housing policy serves the same class interests.

Liberals鈥 policy unchallenged

The John Howard Coalition鈥檚 CGT discount, introduced in 1999, in conjunction with negative gearing, has made housing聽. Then, it took about nine years of per capita household disposable income to cover the average price of a dwelling, according to Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS)聽. Today, it is approaching 17!

TAI senior researcher David Richardson聽聽last month that the latest ABS figures show that total capital gains ($1390.6 billion) now outstrip total wages ($1254.6 billion) and go mostly to 鈥渢he rich and untaxed鈥.

鈥淧eople earning more than $1m a year made up just 0.2% of all taxpayers in 2021鈥22, but they earned 41% of the realised capital gains.

鈥淎ll up the richest 9% earned just under 80% of all the capital gains realised in Australia in 2021鈥22. This accords with the latest Treasury estimate that 80% of the $19bn in taxation foregone in 2023鈥24 (some $15.5bn) due to the 50% capital gains tax discount went to the richest 10%.鈥

TAI released a聽聽in August by Richardson and Professor Frank Stilwell on the worsening inequality of income and wealth.

Their study found that the share of Australia鈥檚 total wealth held by the richest 200 people nearly tripled Gross Domestic Product (GDP) during the last two decades.

This year, the combined wealth of the 200 richest people was $625 billion (Gina Rinehart topped the list with a personal wealth of $40.6 billion) and equivalent to 23.7% of GDP. Twenty years ago, the combined wealth of the richest 200 was $71.5 billion, or 8.4% of GDP.

鈥淢ost countries have one or more forms of wealth tax,鈥 the Richardson-Stilwell report found. 鈥淎ustralia is unique in simultaneously聽lacking a wealth tax and taxing capital gains concessionally. In short, Australia鈥檚 tax聽treatment of wealth is a major cause of inequality in Australia.鈥

The report found that capital gains tax discount since 1999 鈥渉as had a particularly damaging聽effect on housing affordability鈥. Once, purchasing housing was 鈥渞egarded primarily as getting a safe and secure place to live鈥, but now it has 鈥渃ome to be seen as a tax-favoured way to build your wealth鈥.

The price of this is greater housing unaffordability, with disastrous generational consequences.

The latest聽聽showed that in 1981, almost 55% of people aged 25鈥29 were paying a mortgage on a home, or owned one, now only 35% are.

Those who have managed to get a mortgage are saddled with much bigger debts to service.

According to a聽, the number of mortgage holders considered 鈥淓xtremely at Risk鈥 is now 1,013,000 (18.6%), which is significantly above the long-term average of 14.5% over the last 10 years.

Ever bigger numbers of people are being forced into the private rental market, where rents continue to soar.聽

聽found in March that there is no affordable rental accommodation for low-income families in Gadigal Country/Sydney and the Illawarra. Even full-time essential workers, such as nurses, aged care workers, early childhood workers, ambulance officers, cleaners and hospitality workers, were struggling to find affordable rents. Only 1.2% of rentals were affordable to nurses and only 0.9% for a cleaner.

sydney_affordable.png

Rents have become unaffordable in Gadigal Country/Sydney even for full-time essential workers such as nurses, ambulance drivers and aged care workers. Photo: Peter Boyle

罢丑别听AFR, Business Council of Australia and Property Council Australia all want to reduce the housing crisis to that of supply.

While post-COVID-19 material and labour supply shortages and immigration rebound are factors, these are not the core聽reasons聽for the housing affordability crisis.

The billionaire class is happy to scapegoat immigrants and foreigners聽so that聽the public聽won鈥檛 see聽who the real culprits are.

TAI has pointed out that, over the last 10 years, housing supply has increased faster than the population, but house prices have still risen聽.

The key driver fuelling house price inflation is the capitalist class鈥檚 push for greater capital gains.

If they realise their capital gain by selling properties, they get the CCT concession benefit. But they can also use the unrealised capital gain as collateral to borrow more to acquire more properties.

One of 21st聽century capitalism鈥檚 cruel contradictions is that, increasingly, it seeks to make a return on investment without producing anything useful.

Unproductive and destructive speculation remains rampant even after the Great Financial Crisis of 2007鈥09. The housing crisis today is a direct result of this.

[Peter Boyle is a member of the National Executive.]

You need 91自拍论坛, and we need you!

91自拍论坛 is funded by contributions from readers and supporters. Help us reach our funding target.

Make a One-off Donation or choose from one of our Monthly Donation options.

Become a supporter to get the digital edition for $5 per month or the print edition for $10 per month. One-time payment options are available.

You can also call 1800 634 206 to make a donation or to become a supporter. Thank you.