Private prison industry spreads its tentacles

May 27, 2011
Issue 

The Western Australia Liberal government recently said its lucrative prisoner transport contract with private security firm G4S would end in July. Another private company, the British-based conglomerate Serco, will take over.

The move came after a long campaign against G4S and the WA department of corrective services over the death of Aboriginal man Mr Ward, who died of heat stroke in a G4S van during a 360 kilometre trip in January 2008.

The state coroner said G4S was directly responsible for Mr Ward鈥檚 awful death.

But the key demand of the Mr Ward campaign wasn鈥檛 just getting rid of G4S; it argued for an end to the privatisation of prisons and prisoner management.

The awarding of the contract to the secretive Serco has disgusted many.

It鈥檚 the second time G4S has lost a contract to Serco; the federal government gave Serco the contract to run Australia鈥檚 refugee detention network in 2009.

Serco runs two of the eight privately-run prisons in Australia 鈥 WA鈥檚 biggest prison Acacia, and Queensland鈥檚 Borallon prison.

It is aggressively lobbying the NSW government to take over Parklea prison 鈥 already privately run by the GEO Group 鈥 and Cessnock prison, which was the centre of a resolute anti-privatisation campaign in 2009.

Cessnock prison has since remained in public hands.

G4S (formerly GSL) still runs prisons at Port Phillip in Victoria and Mount Gambier in South Australia.

Supporters of prison privatisation say that it will lead to better prisons, due to private sector 鈥渃ompetition鈥 and less bureaucracy. However, private prisons in Australia go largely unregulated and information about conditions inside is limited.

A recent glowing report by the state inspector into Serco鈥檚 Acacia prison ignores the fact that when profit is the main motive, it conflicts with prisoner welfare.

Privatisation creates an incentive for more inmates and longer jail time; the more who go in, the more money comes out.

A 2004 NSW parliament paper said Australia has the 鈥渉ighest proportion of inmates in private prisons of any nation at around 17%鈥. Companies like Serco and the GEO Group 鈥 which runs four Australian prisons and many more in the US 鈥 will fight to have the number rise.

The US has been privatising prisons since the 1980s and has the biggest inmate population in the world. It holds 25% of the world鈥檚 prison population (2 million people) but accounts for only 5% of the world鈥檚 population.

In the US, private prison companies form a powerful lobby to push stronger criminalisation of laws that target the poor (such as the 鈥渨ar on drugs鈥) and immigrants, raising incarceration rates and sentencing times.

As a result, the number of people held in private prisons has swelled by one third over the past decade to 90,000.

This 鈥減rison-industrial complex鈥, with investors on Wall Street and trade shows across the country, is a fast growing and hugely profitable industry.

Inmates form a source of cheap labour. Since privatisation began at least 37 states have legalised the use of prison labour, which is contracted out to other corporations, construction companies and surveillance and technology vendors.

The Centre for Research on Globalisation says companies such as IBM, Boeing, Motorola and Microsoft are among a long list of companies with operations inside prisons.

A March 2008 Global Research article said 鈥渢he federal prison industry produces 100% of all military helmets, ammunition belts, bulletproof vests, ID tags, shirts, pants, tents, bags and canteens鈥.

Prisoner labour is cheap 鈥 as low as 25 cents an hour 鈥 and they have no rights. A strike for working rights in a prison in Georgia was brutally repressed last year.

Thanks to the lobby, laws in the US have changed to make previously legal things a crime, and punishments have become harsher. The 鈥渢hree strikes鈥 law in several US states 鈥 life in prison for three convictions 鈥 is one example.

Another is Arizona鈥檚 SB1070 anti-immigration law, which has been condemned for blatant racial profiling, targeting people of 鈥淟atino appearance鈥 and other migrants.

Immigrantsforsale.org says this law is directly linked to the multi-billion dollar prison industry. Lobby group ALEC 鈥渃rafted a model legislation that became almost word for word Arizona鈥檚 SB1070鈥 鈥 other states have begun to copy the law.

It says that the private prison industry in the US makes $5 billion a year and has spent 鈥渙ver $20 million lobbying state legislators to make sure they get state anti-immigration laws approved and ensure access to more immigrant inmates鈥.

They make $200 per immigrant in prison a night. And $72,000 per immigrant each year.

A May 18 New York Times article said the industry 鈥渉as struggled, in some places, to fill prison beds as the number of inmates nationwide has leveled off鈥 鈥 so states such as Arizona, Ohio and Georgia are signing deals to turn over their overflowing prison population to the private companies.

In 2006, due to overcrowded prisons, California鈥檚 Republican governor Arnold Schwarzenegger used emergency laws to move 10,000 inmates to private prisons in other states.

The prison industry is not about rehabilitating prisoners, reducing crime or improving 鈥渟ervices鈥. It is about keeping jails full.

Keeping a steady flow of prisoners is essential to the profits of companies like Serco.

Those who feel horrified by the path the US has taken, and who find it morally wrong that obscene profit can be made from state punishment, should oppose the privatisation of any detention centres, whether of prisoners, refugees or migrants.

Comments

What a fantastic article. The disgrace that is the US prison system has come about as a direct result of the ideologies that promote the privatisation of absolutely everything. The result, as this article describes, is that private interests, driven solely by profit and completely unanswerable to the electorate, end up dictating laws or, at the very least, interfering in the legislative process. Interestingly, Channel 9 (no doubt along with other networks) recently "covered" Melbourne protests against the incarceration of refugees. The police intervened violently with the protestors and, of course, Channel 9's headline was "Ugly protest in Melbourne". With this level of complicity within the mainstream media, one wonders what chance there is to seriously combat the appalling treatment of poor people everywhere.

You need 91自拍论坛, and we need you!

91自拍论坛 is funded by contributions from readers and supporters. Help us reach our funding target.

Make a One-off Donation or choose from one of our Monthly Donation options.

Become a supporter to get the digital edition for $5 per month or the print edition for $10 per month. One-time payment options are available.

You can also call 1800 634 206 to make a donation or to become a supporter. Thank you.