Many people think of extreme weather events, like floods and fires, as the markers of climate change. However, what makes climate change a 鈥渃risis鈥 and a potential 鈥渃atastrophe鈥 is more than the higher risk of extreme weather events.
Climate change has the potential to bring about an overall break-down in important ecological and social systems: one of these is agriculture and food production.
The most recent found that climate change has already had 鈥渁dverse impacts on human systems, including on water security and food production, health and well-being, and cities, settlements and infrastructure鈥.
Commenting on the report鈥檚 key insights, Professor Rachel Bezner Kerr told that climate change is slowing the growth of agricultural productivity and there is now 鈥渃onsiderably more evidence of projected risks from climate change 鈥 such as droughts, floods and heatwaves 鈥 causing sudden food production losses and limiting access to diverse and nutritious food鈥.
Bezner Kerr was the coordinating lead author of chapter 5 of the IPCC report which dealt with food and other 鈥渆cosystem products鈥.
Scientists have long warned that climate change has the potential to lead to and that by 2100.
A United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) that the global food system 鈥渇aced more hazards such as mega fires, extreme weather, unusually large desert locust swarms, and emerging biological threats鈥 at a rate unmatched in history.
These 鈥渄isasters happen three times more often today, than in the 1970s and 1980s鈥, the FAO report said. Further, 鈥渁griculture absorbs a disproportionate 63 per cent share of their impact, compared to other sectors, such as tourism, commerce and industry鈥.
The latest IPCC report underlines these findings.
鈥淚ncreasing climate extreme events have exposed millions of people to acute food insecurity, particularly in Africa, Asia, Central and South America, on small islands and in the Arctic,鈥 Bezner Kerr said.
Some impacts are now 鈥渋rreversible鈥, the report found, as 鈥渘atural and human systems are pushed beyond their ability to adapt鈥.
The task now is聽to limit the damage. One benchmark is to keep temperature rises to a global average of no more than a 1.5掳C rise above pre-industrial levels. Already at 1.1掳C, several major cereal crops are yielding less in climate-affected areas.
Eight per cent of global farmland would become unsuitable for agriculture if 1.5掳C is reached and it would worsen at 2掳C.
The biggest threats to croplands are in the poor countries of Africa, Asia and Latin America. Rich countries will not escape either.
A聽team of eight co-authors said聽in on February 28 that 鈥渃limate change is bringing hotter temperatures, more dangerous fire weather, more droughts and floods, higher sea levels, and drier winter and spring months to southern and eastern Australia鈥.
鈥淭hese changes are increasing the pressure on our natural environment, settlements, infrastructure and economic sectors including agriculture, finance and tourism.鈥
In agriculture, 鈥渦nwelcome stresses and disruptions鈥 are making it 鈥渕ore challenging to produce food profitably and sustainably鈥. 鈥淚ntensified heat and drought will place yet more stress on our rural communities, particularly in Australia鈥檚 south-west, south and east.鈥
It is clear the world needs to dramatically reduce its use of fossil fuels. In Australia, that means scrapping聽the recently announced聽聽to develop gas in the Beetaloo Basin, Northern Territory,聽along with the more than $10 billion in annual fossil fuel subsidies.
A turn towards regenerative agriculture is also needed.聽Bezner Kerr said the IPCC report highlighted 鈥渁 significantly greater amount of evidence of effective adaptation options in food systems鈥.
She said food security and nutrition, health and wellbeing, livelihoods and biodiversity 鈥渃an all be enhanced鈥 using 鈥渁groecology, community-based adaptation and adopting stress-tolerant crops and livestock鈥. Involving marginalised and vulnerable groups in 鈥渋nclusive planning processes鈥 and 鈥渄rawing on Indigenous and local knowledge鈥 would also support effective adaptation.
that global warming is not 鈥渂aked in for decades鈥 should give climate activists confidence to step up their efforts. If emissions can be brought down close to zero very quickly, global temperatures can begin to stabilise in only a few years (not decades).
The IPCC report emphasised that the timeframe to make the necessary changes is narrowing. Labor and the Coalition parties鈥 support for 鈥渘et zero 2050鈥 involve an 鈥渙vershoot鈥 鈥 temporarily going over 1.5掳C but coming down later.
a leading author of the IPCC report, said evidence shows an overshoot would 鈥渃ause additional and more severe impacts on nature and human systems, some of which will be irreversible 鈥 including species extinctions and loss of coral reefs 鈥 even if global warming is reduced鈥.
[Join the March 25 climate global day of action, details at .]