SOUTH AFRICA: A disillusioned democracy

November 17, 1993
Issue 

Dale T. McKinley, Johannesburg

In the months leading up to South Africa's third national election (which took place on April 14), there was little doubt in anyone's mind that the African National Congress (ANC) was going to win.

Indeed, the main "debate" among the mainstream political pundits and analysts who dominated the media election coverage was centred on the extent of the ANC's victory margin. After all, the ANC's only real electoral opposition consisted mostly of right-wing parties.

The "traditional left" in the Congress of South African Trade Unions and the South African Communist Party obediently played roles as the ANC's cheerleaders-in-chief. The more radical social movements called for either an election boycott or for the casting of spoilt ballots.

The electoral campaign of the ANC was run in true capitalist political style, with millions of rands in corporate donations providing the necessary money-power.

President Thabo Mbeki and his coterie of ministers crisscrossed the country on a whirlwind roadshow especially designed to show the "common touch" of the ANC's political elite.

Ready-made photo opportunities with destitute rural pensioners and urban township youth were mixed in with "reconciliatory" visits to ultra-wealthy townhouse complexes.

The cameras clicked away, the dutiful articles appeared in the papers and the airwaves were filled with "news" about the "new look" Mbeki and interminable (and mostly sycophantic) interviews with various ANC leaders.

The former liberation movement parties of the "left" such as the Pan Africanist Congress and the Azanian People's Organisation were left to shamelessly feed off the ANC's scraps and show just how hopelessly out of touch they have become in confronting the neoliberal juggernaut.

On the other side of the political, ideological and organisational tracks, anti-capitalist social movements such as the Anti-Privatisation Forum (APF) and the Landless People's Movement (LPM) used the election period to intensify grassroots organisation and struggle centred on the most basic socio-economic needs of the majority poor.

For political, tactical and material reasons, the APF, along with several other social movements, chose not to contest the national elections and called for the masses to join the social movements in the longer-term struggle to build an alternative to the ANC through building people's organisation on the ground, uniting working class forces and taking mass action in struggle.

The APF called for those who wanted to participate in voting to cast spoilt ballots, while the LPM called for a boycott through its No Land, No Vote campaign.

During the run-up to the elections, and in what has now become a commonplace practice of the ANC and the repressive state apparatus it controls, social movement activists were consistently monitored, harassed, intimidated, physically attacked and in two notable cases, subject to mass arrests and incarceration, for simply daring to organise legitimate public protests.

Clearly afraid of the incipient people's power, and the practical effect of the struggles of the social movements, the ANC went out of its way to perfect its usual "talk left" electoral message. It promised heaven and earth to South Africa's poor, while ensuring, with lots of help from the kowtowing media, that its "act right" neoliberal macro-economic strategy, responsible for mass unemployment and impoverishment, remained firmly in the shadows.

On election day, and before the indelible ink used to mark voters' fingers had the time to dry, the media were predictably running headlines such as "Huge Turnout for Elections" and "ANC Set for Landslide".

By the time all the votes had been counted the following day, confirming a comfortable ANC victory, ANC leaders were crowing about receiving a "decisive mandate" and garnering "the support of the overwhelming majority of the people". And yet, for all the political spin dished out by the ANC and its corporate media acolytes about the ANC's "massive victory", a 76% voter turnout and South Africa's "mature democracy", the reality tells another story:

  • Only 56% (15,806,380) of all eligible voters (27,438,897) cast their ballots.

  • Just under 7 million of those eligible did not even bother to register to vote.

  • Of those registered to vote (20,600,000), 5 million chose not to exercise their vote.

  • Just 38% (10,877,302) of the entire voting population voted for the ANC.

  • There were 250,871 spoilt votes and in the industrial heartland of South Africa (the Gauteng province, which includes Johannesburg), the ANC vote dropped by some 175,000 from the previous national elections.

The national voting turnout has gradually decreased since South Africa's first, one-person one-vote elections. In 1994, 19.5 million people voted; in 1999 just over 16 million voted; and in 2004, under 16 million (remembering that the country's population has grown substantially over the last decade).

Despite these realities, Mbeki was arrogant and disingenuous enough to claim publicly, soon after the elections that the people "have spoken loudly and said that they have understood the truths the ANC has communicated to them, and understood the falsehoods that others have told, they have firmly rejected the false claim that their movement, the ANC, has failed them".

Even worse, Mbeki went on to quote from the biography of that paragon of intellectual strength and democratic virtuosity, US President George W. Bush, about how the US remains a divided "two-nation" society. Mbeki asked smugly: "After 200 years it [the US] still has not been able to solve problems of poverty. Why then do people expect the ANC to have solved such problems in 10 years?"

Of course, the question Mbeki should have asked, but which he and his ANC cronies are clearly too terrified to even contemplate, is: Why, after only 10 years of capitalist democracy, has participation in South Africa's elections been reduced to almost the same levels as that of a country that has been holding elections for over 200 years?

What South Africa's third national election has confirmed is that millions of poor are deeply disillusioned with a "democracy" and an ANC that promised them so much 10 years ago but that has delivered the goods to the rich. It confirms the commodification of that "democracy" (along with almost everything else), in which national elections have rapidly been turned into the political playground of those with access to capitalist patronage.

The election also confirms the huge potential that exists for the social movements and the rank and file of the organised working class to fill the political vacuum and build a viable and radical people's power alternative to the ANC.

From 91×ÔÅÄÂÛ̳ Weekly, April 29, 2004.
Visit the


You need 91×ÔÅÄÂÛ̳, and we need you!

91×ÔÅÄÂÛ̳ is funded by contributions from readers and supporters. Help us reach our funding target.

Make a One-off Donation or choose from one of our Monthly Donation options.

Become a supporter to get the digital edition for $5 per month or the print edition for $10 per month. One-time payment options are available.

You can also call 1800 634 206 to make a donation or to become a supporter. Thank you.