Venezuela: Dodgy dossier鈥檚 terror claims questioned

May 14, 2011
Issue 

No sooner had the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) released its dossier The FARC Files: Venezuela, Ecuador and the Secret Archive of Raul Reyes on May 10, that the international media was once again claiming more proof that Venezuelan government links to terrorism had been uncovered.

Almost none mention that the entire basis of the document were files that Interpol and US and Colombian officials have admitted are dubious at best.

In fact, Francisco Dominguez pointed out in a May 13 New Statesman article that the IISS is the same group that created the fraudulent September 2002 dossier Iraq鈥檚 Weapons of Mass Destruction: A Net Assessment.

The dossier鈥檚 false information about Iraq鈥檚 supposed WMD stockpile was used as a key justification for the US-led war on oil-rich Iraq.

See also:

The latest dossier is based on files supposedly obtained from laptops belonging to former Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) leader Raul Reyes.

Twenty-five people, including Reyes, were killed when Colombia illegally bombed a FARC camp in Ecuadorian territory in 2008.

Colombian authorities claimed three laptops, two external hard disks, and three USB drives somehow survived the bombing and happened to be filled with files linking the FARC to pretty much anyone the US and Colombia said supported terrorism.

However, many have called into question the validity of these files.

In a May 10 British Guardian article, Greg Grandin and Miguel Tinker Salas said Interpol鈥檚 forensic report of the hardware indicated that Colombian authorities had modified 9440 files, and deleted a further 2905 files.

Colombia鈥檚 treatment of the material, according to Interpol, 鈥渄id not conform to internationally recognised principles for the ordinary handling of electronic evidence by law enforcement鈥.

The authors also pointed out that 鈥淐olombian military鈥檚 claims that files showed the Farc were planning to make a 鈥榙irty bomb鈥 were publicly dismissed by the US government and terrorism experts鈥.

IISS's offer of a CD-ROM with the dossier 鈥渃ontaining all relevant e-mails鈥 found on Reyes' laptops, is all the more remarkable given that in October 2010, Colombia鈥檚 Inspector General Alejandro Ordonez confirmed that no emails had been found in the laptops.

Police inspector Ronald Coy Cortiz testified in 2008 that his team of inspectors 鈥渉aven鈥檛 seen any e-mails, I haven鈥檛 found them so far.鈥

Even the Colombian Supreme Court has considered 鈥渆vidence鈥 from the laptops to be legally inadmissible.

As Grandin and Salas note, what more should we expect 鈥渇rom some of the same people who deceived the people of the United States and the United Kingdom into invading Iraq鈥.

Among those on the IISS's advisory council are: Robert D Blackwill, former deputy national security adviser to George W Bush; Eliot Cohen, formerly secretary of state Condoleezza Rice鈥檚 senior adviser on strategic issues; Sir David Manning, formerly foreign policy adviser to Tony Blair; and Prince Faisal bin Salman bin Abdulaziz of Saudi Arabia.

The Venezuelan embassy in Britain has warned that this report 鈥渃ould become part of an aggressive propaganda tool against Venezuela to undermine progress in the region, precisely at a time when relations between Venezuela and Colombia have reached a level of stable cooperation and friendly dialogue.鈥

Comments

Dubious at best? Interpol has said that documents were "opened" but that none had been altered. Where's the honesty on the left anymore?
I guess it wasn't worth mentioning that Interpol has repeatedly said the laptops were genuine and the contents had not been modified? I guess the author didn't want us to know that.
so interpol has repeated said all the documents are genuine, and yet you cant find a single quote or source to prove it? Meanwhile the ACTUALLY Interpol report said (as stated in the article) Colombia芒聙聶s treatment of the material 芒聙聹did not conform to internationally recognised principles for the ordinary handling of electronic evidence by law enforcement芒聙聺. A judgement the Colombian Supreme Court (not know as a bastion of the left) recently agreed with when it ruled all files obtained from the laptop as inadmissible in court. So i ask, whose the real bullshit artist?

You need 91自拍论坛, and we need you!

91自拍论坛 is funded by contributions from readers and supporters. Help us reach our funding target.

Make a One-off Donation or choose from one of our Monthly Donation options.

Become a supporter to get the digital edition for $5 per month or the print edition for $10 per month. One-time payment options are available.

You can also call 1800 634 206 to make a donation or to become a supporter. Thank you.