Medicare problems point to systematic underfunding, corporatisation

October 31, 2022
Issue 
Photo: Pranidchakan Boonrom/Pexels

A controversy has erupted over a recent joint investigation by the ABC and Fairfax media into alleged fraud in the Medicare system.

The investigation claimed that doctors are 鈥渞orting鈥 up to $8 billion from Medicare each year, including by 鈥渂illing dead people and falsifying patient records to boost profits鈥.

Another 20 Sydney Morning Herald and Age articles, plus multiple ABC聽7.30聽stories, amplified the聽claims.

The joint聽investigation suggested that 鈥渁mbulances ramping, public hospitals not cop[ing] and general practices in tatters鈥 are 鈥渁ll part of the same problem鈥: doctors defrauding聽Medicare.

At the centre of the claim is evidence presented in Margaret Faux鈥檚 PhD thesis. Faux is a lawyer and head of a company that handles Medicare claims on behalf of doctors.

A number of doctors鈥 representatives, including Australian Medical Association president Steve Robson, have challenged the accusations, claiming they are 鈥渁n unjustified slur鈥 on the medical聽profession, while admitting he had not read Faux鈥檚 thesis.

An analysis by medical researchers Eddie Cliff and Tori Berquist published in the medical newsletter Insight on October 25 stated that they 鈥渇ound no evidence鈥 in her thesis to support the $8 billion fraud estimate. 鈥淲e think that number is likely to be much lower.鈥

However, the authors admit Faux is correct that the research shows the main cause of non-compliant聽Medicare聽billing is 鈥渟ystem issues, rather than deliberate abuse by medical practitioners鈥.

鈥淢edical practitioners have no choice but to try and comply with a complex system they cannot avoid, do not understand, and feel powerless to change,鈥 Cliff and Berquist said.

They said that Medicare聽fraud 鈥渃ertainly exists鈥 and pointed to the National Audit Office鈥檚聽鈥檚聽estimate that fraud and inappropriate practice represent less than 1% of health providers, that 95% of providers are compliant and that 2鈥4% of providers have only 鈥渙ccasional or inadvertent non-compliance鈥.

鈥淚t estimates non-compliance (a much broader concept than fraud) costs between $366 million and $2.2 billion, estimates generated by management consultants and Department of Health analysts. International benchmarks seem to corroborate a ~聽fraud rate.鈥

The estimate of $8 billion fraud would represent around a quarter of the total Medicare annual budget of $31.4 billion 鈥 an unlikely scenario.

However,聽evidence of systemic problems exists.

, a consultant physician and fellow at the Centre for Health Informatics at Macquarie University, told the ABC on October 23 that focusing on doctors misusing the聽Medicare聽system overlooks the bigger, systemic problem.

鈥淲hen you look at routine day-to-day care, the amount of wastage, overuse and underuse of resources and inappropriate care which leads to poor patient outcomes, that is 10 times bigger than the cost of fraud,鈥 he said.

Patients really want better and more equitable access to health services, , chief executive of the Consumers Health Forum, told the ABC.

鈥淧atients love the idea of聽Medicare,聽but they don鈥檛 love the rising costs of co-payments as it impacts their access to healthcare and its equitable distribution.

鈥淲hen the system was designed, it was geared for acute care, but we have a burden of chronic disease and we need a system to manage that.鈥

As we emerge from the COVID-19 pandemic, Medicare鈥檚 challenges, particularly its budget, are under close scrutiny. Frontline workers say the system is聽聽precisely because it is underfunded.

It is therefore critical to defend and extend Medicare as a central element of a universal public health-care system.聽

Charles Maskell-Knight argued in 聽that as聽, the聽focus is shifting to maximising聽Medicare聽billings over聽the quality of the care provided.聽

As Crikey observed on October聽21:聽鈥淢edicare聽in this context is聽not聽the healthcare system. It鈥檚 an itemised fee schedule for services provided by specialist doctors in private practice.

鈥淚t doesn鈥檛 cover public hospitals, where most of our health dollars are spent, and whose staff (doctors as well as nurses) have borne the brunt of COVID-19.

鈥淧ublic hospitals are funded through a different stream, and their medical staff are paid a salary, not per intervention.鈥

The creeping privatisation of Medicare, over several decades, is undermining the universal public medical system. Bulk-billing rates have decreased markedly in recent years. The fee-for-service model, with rising patient co-payments, could cripple Medicare as the public health system it started out as.

You need 91自拍论坛, and we need you!

91自拍论坛 is funded by contributions from readers and supporters. Help us reach our funding target.

Make a One-off Donation or choose from one of our Monthly Donation options.

Become a supporter to get the digital edition for $5 per month or the print edition for $10 per month. One-time payment options are available.

You can also call 1800 634 206 to make a donation or to become a supporter. Thank you.