Climate activists in Western Australia are resisting an intimidation campaign by police who聽raided the homes of artists Trent Rojahn and Joana Partyka in the last week of February in connection to their climate activism.
Partyka pleaded guilty, and was ordered to pay $7500, in relation to a January action highlighting Woodside's climate vandalism. The raid came after she'd fully paid the fine with police claiming she was under suspicion for conspiracy.
"Honestly, it would be funny if it wasn't so terrifying," Partyka told 91自拍论坛.
"They served me with a data access order to force me to hand over passwords to my devices," she said.
She also 聽it聽as 鈥渕assive over-reach from authorities designed to intimidate us鈥.
Rojahn's case in connection with spraying 鈥淒isrupt Burrup Hub鈥 outside the Woodside office on February 13 is now before the courts. 聽the night raid by police as 鈥淲oodside's dirty work鈥.
There was a small but important victory against similar intimidation聽on February 14聽when the court decided in favour of Petrina Harley and Elizabeth Burrow. They were convicted in January in connection to a November 2021 protest against the Scarborough Gas Hub.
Prosecutors tried to hit the pair with a claim for $33,000 in legal costs, which Harley told聽91自拍论坛聽was 鈥渂latant intimidation鈥. The February 14 decision聽rejected聽the police claim.
Harley said police were trying to punish the pair over and above the penalty imposed by the magistrate聽to deter other activists.
Police had also attempted to secure court costs against a third activist,聽who was arrested as part of the same action and then pleaded guilty. Police were unsuccessful and didn't appeal the decision.
Liam Cross from Extinction Rebellion WA and Socialist Alliance told 91自拍论坛 that climate activism is particularly significant because of the huge amounts of fossil fuel extraction in WA.
鈥淩aids, disproportionate penalties and legal fees are indicative of how far the government will go to protect the interests of its corporate sponsors,鈥 he said.
Cross is also facing court over a climate protest.
Harley and Burrow mounted a 鈥渃limate emergency鈥 defence in their case.
This defence is based on an argument that what might be criminal action in other circumstances is not criminal when trying to prevent a bigger crime.
For example, it may be illegal in most circumstances to deliberately break a shop window, but such action is not illegal when required to prevent a more serious crime (such as聽murder).
Palestine solidarity activists in Britain to avoid prosecution over protests involving damage to Israeli weapons company Elbit Systems.
Fossil fuel companies' wilful destruction of a liveable climate聽is undoubtedly a bigger crime than any charge levelled against climate protesters.聽, Woodside's profits are the 鈥減roceeds of crime against climate and culture鈥.
Harley told 91自拍论坛:聽鈥淚t is vital that we keep on using [the climate emergency] defence because eventually a magistrate will be forced to listen鈥.
She described the solidarity she had聽received:聽鈥淎ll our fines were crowd funded, which allows activists to keep on going鈥.聽Every action creates 鈥渞ipples in the pond and eventually we will win,鈥 she said.
Cross also paid tribute to climate activists who are 鈥渨illingly facing the brunt of these draconian anti-protest policies鈥 telling 91自拍论坛:聽鈥淭heir bravery in the face of this adversity is an inspiration to climate activists and concerned citizens world wide鈥.