Two Australian citizens were killed by Israeli air strikes in southern Lebanon on December 27, Attorney General Mark Dreyfus confirmed on聽. He added that Hezbollah, a listed terrorist organisation, had claimed links to one of the Bazzi brothers.
An Israeli missile hit a home in Bint Jbeil where 27-year-old civilian聽, along with his brother Ali, were staying.
The newly-married couple was planning to return to Australia, while Hezbollah聽.
Dreyfus said fighting with a listed terrorist organization, or providing it with financial assistance, are 鈥渧ery serious terrorist鈥 offences. He said Labor has聽 constitutionally-sound citizenship stripping laws聽that could apply.
But there is a greater concern which the government is not discussing: dozens of Australians are reportedly going to Israel to fight for it. This is despite it perpetrating what are alleged to be multiple聽.
South Africa warned that聽聽of their citizenship status if they join in what it has declared to be a genocide.
The legalities around such participation may be blurred here since聽聽鈥淥peration Prosperity Guardian鈥.
A tale of different criminalities
Belgian-Lebanese activist Dyab Abou Jahjah聽聽that the 30 March Movement had filed a legal challenge in the Netherlands regarding whether Dutch-Israeli citizen Jonathan Ben Hamou鈥檚 participation in Israeli operations had violated local and international law. 鈥淢ore legal actions will be taken in the Netherlands and Belgium,鈥 he said.
Just a week into Israel launching its war on the 2.3 million Palestinians in the walled-in region of Gaza, the Sydney Morning Herald (SMH) said 聽in its Gaza offensive, which has as its stated aim the destruction of Hamas. Australians in Israel were called on to join the assault on the Gaza Strip in its first week.
SMH聽called up for training, but one person involved in the first wave of attacks was not due to the 鈥渘ature鈥 of his unit.
The SMH quoted a spokesperson for the Department of Home Affairs saying that Australians returning to Israel to take part in the fighting must be a part of the Israeli Defense Forces, or聽risk breaking the law. The spokesperson did not say how many Australians were involved.
In the early days of Israel鈥檚 assault on Gaza, the Attorney General聽said nothing about Australian citizens potentially breaking local laws. Indeed, reports on those heading to Israel have Dreyfus stating: 鈥淎ustralia stands as one with Israel鈥.
Three months into the genocidal war, Israel has killed聽, the overwhelming majority of whom were civilians, and more than 10,000 were children.
Criminal foreign fighters
鈥淲e are continuing to make inquiries,鈥 Dreyfus聽. 鈥淏ut I鈥檇 repeat, Hizballah is a listed terrorist organisation under Australian law鈥 and it鈥檚 an offence for any Australian 鈥渢o cooperate with, to support, let alone to fight with鈥 such a terror organisation.
The Tony Abbott Coalition enacted foreign fighter laws, which were聽聽of anti-terror legislation introduced in 2014. They included laws establishing the metadata retention regime and others that enhanced ASIO computer surveillance capabilities and provided spies with immunity.
These laws were a notable selection from the now 100-odd pieces of national security and terrorism legislation that have been passed with bipartisan support since the 2001 9/11 terror attacks in New York.
These laws, which include the聽聽which was inserted part 5.5 into the聽, have eroded the civil liberties of all. They were the second tranche of the 2014 terror laws and passed with bipartisan support at the height of a scare campaign about the Islamic State in November of that year.
Foreign fighters, the bill鈥檚聽, 鈥渕ay have fought alongside listed terrorist organisations in overseas conflicts and return to Australia with enhanced terrorism capabilities and ideological commitment鈥, which, it argues, heightens the likelihood of local acts of terrorism.
Part 5.5 of division 119 of the Criminal Code contains a number of offences related to entering a military zone in another country in which the Australian foreign minister has designated a terrorist organisation is engaging in hostile activity against that country鈥檚 government or people.
Offences such as entering a foreign country to engage in hostile activities, preparing to or accumulating weapons to engage in such activities, training others to engage in hostile activities, as well as allowing buildings or vessels to be used in such activities, are liable to life imprisonment.
All these international crimes are聽, meaning the prosecution does not have to prove intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, for a defendant to be found guilty of the crime. Neither are any defences open to the accused.
Core international crimes
While foreign fighter laws do aim to prevent Australians travelling to the Middle East to fight alongside Hamas and Hezbollah, by Australia, the laws do little to stop Australians joining the Israeli Defense Forces.
This is despite the fact that international crimes in the聽聽are reflected in federal law.
Most of the charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity, since October 7, have been levelled at Israel鈥檚 actions. One hundred and twenty three nations are party to the Rome Statute, which requires them to create the same international criminal offences in their own domestic law. Palestine has ratified the ICC treaty, while Israel has not.
The John Howard government passed the聽. This inserted division 268 into chapter 8 of the Criminal Code, which holds multiple offences relating to three core international crimes: genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity.
Some of the international crimes that exist in Australian law, and have been directed at Israel鈥檚 actions over the past three months, include genocide by inflicting destructive life conditions, extermination, persecution, apartheid, willful killing and inhumane acts.
But the key charge against Israel 鈥斅 鈥 comes under section 268.3 of the Criminal Code: it is an offence to cause the death of one or more persons of a particular national, ethnical, racial or religious group in order to destroy it, in part or entirely.
While the foreign fighter crime might capture Australians who fight on behalf of Hamas or Hezbollah, the real issue is whether Australians are fighting on behalf of Israel.
Just as European activists have started proceedings against fellow nationals that may have broken international laws, enacted under domestic law, Australians have an opportunity to take such legal measures against citizens who have fought on the side of Israel.
The British International Centre of Justice for Palestinians聽has 聽supporting Israel that they may be prosecuted for complicity and encouraging war crimes.
Three United States Palestinian groups have filed a case with the ICC against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
It is possible, therefore,聽that Australians fighting on behalf of the Israeli Defense Forces may face聽domestic criminal charges聽against them on their return.
[Paul Gregoire writes for , where this article was first published.]