Reporting Israel’s war on Gaza has become the greatest credibility challenge for journalists and the media in our time.
The latest assassination of an Al Jazeera photojournalist, while documenting atrocities, has prompted a leading analyst to appeal to global journalists to “take a stand” to protect the profession.
ճ, the 27-year-old eldest son of Al Jazeera Gaza bureau chief Wael Dahdouh, along with freelancer Mustafa Thuraya, has taken the death toll of Palestinian journalists to 109 (according to Al Jazeera sources, even while global media freedom watchdogs report slightly lower figures).
Emotional responses and a wave of condemnation have thrown the spotlight on the toll faced by reporters and their families.
Wael Dahdouh, 52,,in an earlier Israeli air raid that hit the house they were sheltering in. After mourning for several hours, Dahdouh senior was back on the job, documenting the war.
Just under 20 months ago, Al Jazeera’s best known correspondent,, was fatally shot by an Israeli sniper, while reporting on the Occupied West Bank on May 11, 2022 in what Paris-based Reporters Without Borders (RSF) condemned, saying this “systematic Israeli impunity is outrageous”.
The New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists , saying it “must be independently investigated, and those behind their deaths must be held accountable”.
But few journalists would accept that this is anything other than a targeted killing, as most deaths of Palestinian journalists in the latest Gaza war have been: there is a in an attempt to suppress the truth.
‘Nowhere safe in Gaza’
Al Jazeera’s Palestinian-Israeli political affairs analyst and author , who was born in Nazareth, has no doubt.
Speaking on the 24-hour Qatari world news channel, with at least in Gaza — 70% of whom were women and children — he said: “Nowhere is safe in Gaza and no journalists are safe … That tells us something.
“It is understood they are war journalists. But still the fact that more than 100 journalists were killed within three months is breaking yet another record in terms of killing children. and destruction of hospitals and schools and the killing of United Nations staff.
“And now with 109 journalists killed, this definitely requires a certain stand on the part of our colleagues around the world. Not just in a higher-up institution.
“I am talking about journalists around the world — those who came to cover the World Cup in Doha for labour rights, or whatever.
“Those who are shedding tears in the Ukraine, those who are trying to cover Xinjiang in China [persecution of the Uyghur people], those who are claiming there are genocides happening right, left and centre — from China to Ukraine, to elsewhere.
“The same journalists who see in plain sight what is happening in Gaza should — regardless if we disagree on Israel’s motives, or Israel’s objectives in this war — must agree that the protection of journalists and their families is indispensable for our profession. And for their profession,” Bishara said.
“Journalists, and journalism associations and syndicates around the world, especially in those countries with influence on Israel, as in Europe, or the United States … need to take a stand on what is going on in Gaza.
‘Cannot go unanswered’
“This cannot continue and go on unanswered. What about them?
“They’re going to be from various media outlets deploying journalists in war-stricken areas. They will have to call for the defence of journalists and their lives and their protection.
“This cannot go on like this, unabated in Gaza,” Bishara said as the fighting could go on for another year.
ճ,filed against Israel in the International Court of Justice seeking an interim injunction for a ceasefire and due for a hearing on January 11, could pose the best chance for an end to the war.
Bishara has partially blamed Western news networks for failing to report the war on Gaza accurately and fairly: it is a criticism he has made in the past, and his articles about Israel are insightful and damning.
His call for journalists to take a stand has been echoed in some quarters where .
It has opened divisions among media groups about fairness and balance that have become the most bitter since the climate change and COVID-19 pandemic debates, when threatened to undermine science.
In November, more than 1500 journalists from scores of US media organisations signed an in Western media’s coverage of “Israeli atrocities against Palestinians”.
Israel has blocked foreign press entry, heavily restricted telecommunications and bombed press offices. Some 50 media headquarters in Gaza have been hit in the past month.
Israeli forces explicitly warned newsrooms they “cannot guarantee” the safety of their employees from airstrikes. Taken with a decades-long pattern of lethally targeting journalists, Israel’s actions show wide-scale suppression of speech.
In Britain, eight in late November to Al Jazeera accusing the British broadcaster of bias in its coverage of Gaza.
A 2300-word letter claimed that the BBC had a “double standard” and was failing to tell the Israel-Palestine conflict accurately, “investing greater effort in humanising Israeli victims compared with Palestinians and omitting key historical context in coverage”.
In Australia, another and the Media Entertainment and Arts Association (MEAA) called for “integrity, transparency and rigour” in the coverage of the war and joined the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ), RSF and others condemning Israel’s attacks on journalists and journalism.
Editors of The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age and the Nine Network hit back by banning staff who had signed the letter.
According to , a senior Nine staff journalist resigned and readers angrily cancelled their subscriptions over the ban.
later exposed that many editors and journalists who had made and it is keeping an inventory of these “influenced” media people: at least 77 so far.
The Daily Blog’s editor Martyn Bradbury has also / have also been influenced by Israeli media massaging.
Bradbury wrote: “If Israel has sunk that much time and resource charming Australian journalists and politicians, the question has to be asked, [has] the pro-Israel lobby sent NZ journalists and politicians on these junkets and if they have, who are they?”
He wrote to the NZ Press Gallery, the “journalist union”, and media companies requesting a list of names.
Pacific journalists ought to be also added to the list.
I have just returned to NZ from a two-month trip in the Mediterranean, Red Sea and Australia.After a steady diet of comprehensive and well back-grounded reporting from global news channels such as TRT World News and Al Jazeera (which contrasted in quality, depth and fairness with Western coverage from the BBC and CNN), I was stunned by the blatant bias of much of the Australian news media, particularly News Corp’s The AustralianԻThe Advertiser in Adelaide.
Some examples of the bias, and my commentaries, can be seen ,,,,Ի.
A pithy indictment of much of the Western reporting — including in NZ — can be read in the .
Exposing much of the Israeli propaganda and fabricated claims since October 7 (and even from the time of The Nakba in 1948) : “I am haunted by one other consideration. It is not just that Western commentators, columnists and chat show hosts often don’t know what they are talking about. It’s not even that they pretend they do.
“It’s the comfort of their lives. They sit in warm, pleasant studios where they earn six-figure sums for their opinions. They take no risks and convey no truths.”
A polar opposite from the Gaza carnage and the risks that courageous Palestinian journalists face daily to bear witness. They are an inspiration to the rest of us.
[ is editor and publisher of Asia Pacific Report and Café Pacific where this piece was first published.]