Internet censorship

Meta notified Pilbara for Palestine that the page 鈥渋mpersonates a business鈥, before permanently removing it. Chris Jenkins reports.

Big Tech behemoths have much to answer for: the destruction of privacy, the ruthless monetisation of user data, behavioural modification and hypnotic seduction. But聽Binoy Kampmark argues that censorship is not the answer.

Social media corporations exercise a lot of power to manipulate people鈥檚 social and political views. As their聽power聽grows, Pip Hinman and Susan Price聽urge you to support 91自拍论坛鈥檚 voice-for-the-resistance journalism.

Can we trust the state to decide on what is, or is not, misinformation of disinformation? Binoy Kampmark suggests not.

As more of our lives are mediated through the internet, private companies cannot be allowed to dictate the terms on which we relate to each other, argue Tim Scriven 补苍诲听Aleks Wansbrough.

Dozens of聽Palestinian journalists聽protested social media giant Facebook on March 5, criticising its routine blocking of accounts from the Middle Eastern country.

The Labor Party has backed federal government legislation that will, in some circumstances, force Australian internet service providers (ISPs) to block their customers from accessing certain online services. Labor and Coalition senators passed the Copyright Amendment (Online Infringement) Bill 2015 on June 22, with the Greens and a number of other cross-bench senators voting against the legislation.